StoreFront Multi-Site configurations are still fairly unknown. I guess this has something to do with XenDesktop 7 still being relatively new (I know, itโs actually a StoreFront 2.0 feature) and with this I mean, the addition of the XenApp functionality. Since zones are no longer part of XenDesktop 7, or the Flex Management Architecture (theyโve disappeared together with the Local Host cache) youโll have to, in most cases, create separate Sites to achieve similar results. Especially if Sites are geographically separated. When using StoreFront Multi-Site configurations we can still add in load balance and failover capabilities, even when using geographically โDispersedโ Sites, just like we are (or were) used to with zones. No NetScaler required, although itโs probably a good idea to implement one anyway.
Another approach
With FMA your central SQL database is probably one of the most important components of your infrastructure, if itโs down, your Site wonโt accept any new connections (due to the lack of LHC) and you wonโt be able to make any configuration changes as well. Of course there are ways to implement additional SQL stability, like: Clustering and mirroring for example, but what if that doesnโt function as well?! And lets be honest, it often doesnโt. Then an alternative, or extra, Site would be a good thing to have in place, to say the least. What if you have two active Sites, A & B, and Site A or B, for whatever reason, becomes unreachable? Or perhaps youโd like a way to load balance your traffic between Site A & B (like we do (or did) with zones).
You may also want to point, or map, your users as close to their data (center) or Site as possible, like we can do with the IMA (XenApp) zone preference policies for example. Perhaps youโd like to configure and assign a (non active) recovery Site? Because of the added functionality, and at the same time, change in architecture as far as the RDSH solutions (formar XenApp) are concerned, weโll need to rethink our designs when it comes to FMA vs IMA and the replacement of WebInterface with StoreFront. But donโt worry, itโs all (still) there, even without multiple WebInterfaces / StoreFronts and or NetScaler(s) configured, although this is probably a setup which we wonโt see that often, but still.
Default StoreFrontย behaviour
By default StoreFront will enumerate all apps and desktops it can find from all Sites and Farms configured, these can come from: XenDesktop, XenApp and or VDI-in-a-Box Controllers. So when we add in an extra set of (Delivery) Controllers from another (load balance, failover or recovery) Site it will automatically enumerate any resources your users will have access to. Not a bad thing per se but this will also mean that if an application and or desktop is available from multiple Sites your users will see an icon for each resource, meaning double icons, assuming you have proper permissions on both Sites that is. Hereโs where Multi Site configurations come in. During this article I assume we are using at least two sites or more, Iโm mentioning this because some of the features discussed can also be applied on single Site / Farm configurations, or deployments, as Citrix likes to call them.
Multi Site features
With a StoreFront Multi Site configuration, when a desktop or application is available from multiple Sites and or Farms, StoreFront will aggregate all instances of that particular resource and presents it with a single icon. For this to work, deployments do not need to be identical per se, but the desktops and or applications do need to have the exact same name and path on each server, all other configured characteristics need to ย match as well. Due note that App Controller applications cannot be aggregated. This comes from the E-Docs website: When a user starts an aggregated resource, StoreFront determines the most appropriate instance (Delivery Controller) of that resource for the user on the basis of server availability, whether the user already has an active session, and the ordering you specified in your configuration. Now thatโs smart right? Check out some more details here.
User Mapping and failover
Multi Site StoreFront configurations also lets us set up highly available deployments. We can configure load balancing, failover or a (non active) disaster recovery site. You also have the ability to set up something called User Mapping. This basically means you can set up access to a specific deployment based on certain user memberships of Microsoft Active Directory groups, zone preference policies if you will. This allows you to create multiple Sites, or deployments, offering different resources, still all aggregated through the same Store(Front), simply by adding in multiple (Delivery) Controllers. However, your users will only see what their permissions allow them to. Another example would be to create two (can be more of course) identical Sites and configure one group of users to always connect to Site A and another group of users to always connect to Site B. This way Site A can also function as a failover Site for Site B and vice versa. Preferably youโll use at least two separate StoreFront servers, one (or more) per Site. Again, all users will need to have permissions on the same apps and or desktops at both Sites, see my notes on this earlier under Multi Site features.
Load balance
Remember that in a multi site configuration StoreFront will aggregate all instances of a particular resource, from all configured Sites / deployments, and will present this to the user in the form of one single icon, so no issues there. Of course this setup would also work without user mapping configured, although then it would be active / passive instead of active / active, unless you have 2 or more StoreFront servers in combination with a NetScaler configured. Active / passive would also mean you can do with just one StoreFront server if you like. This same setup (although configured differently) could also be used to load balance connections between multiple Sites. Instead of contacting one of the โextraโ Controllers for redundancy purposes, connections will be randomly spread across the configured controllers, evenly distributing the load, again using just one StoreFront server, although you could, and probably should, use more. This is all done by configuring certain attributes within the so called web.config file on StoreFront, a bit more on this in the conclusion.
Subscription synchronization
If your users connect to multiple StoreFront servers residing in different StoreFront deployments, or server groups, and they are able to access similar applications and or desktop within these deployments than you might want to consider implementing something called subscription synchronization. This will ensure that all StoreFront servers in both, or multiple, deployments will exactly know which apps and or desktops the user is subscribed to, so they wonโt need to subscribe to an application again when logging on to one of the other deployments. You can configure periodic synchronization of users’ application subscriptions between stores in different server groups. However, for this to work all stores need to have the same name and all server groups must reside within the Active Directory domain containing your users accounts or within a domain that has a trust relationship with the user accounts domain. The Citrix E-Docs websiteย will tell you more about it.
Optimal NetScaler Gateway
If your deployments each do have a separate NetScaler configured, then StoreFront enables you to define the optimal, or preferred, appliance for users to access each of the deployments. Here is a good example taken from the E-Docs website: If you create a store that aggregates resources from two geographical locations, each with a NetScaler Gateway appliance, users connecting through an appliance in one location can start a desktop or application in the other location. However, by default, the connection to the resource is then routed through the appliance to which the user originally connected and must therefore traverse the corporate WAN. With โOptimal NetScalerโ routing we can change this. Besides the above you can also use NetScaler to load balance the connection made from your StoreFront server to, for example, your delivery controllers within your Site, and load balance those as well. The same can be done from your NetScaler to multiple StoreFront servers you might have, the combinations are endless, so to speak, out of scope for now though.
The web.config file
Thatโs where all the magic happens. All of the above configurations, including disaster recovery Sites not mentioned, need to be configured within the web.config file. By default itโs located here: C:inetpubwwwrootCitrixstorename directory, where โstorenameโ is the name specified for the store when it was created. Be aware, that after making configuration changes to the file, that some tasks become unavailable in the Citrix StoreFront GUI to prevent misconfiguration (why not build this functionality into the GUI instead?). Once the web.config file is updated and saved its effective immediately, if itโs configured incorrectly then StoreFront simply wonโt work. At least youโll know what caused it right?!
Conclusion
We briefly talked about editing the web.config file in general, and some of the added functionality Multi Site configurations have to offer. I also thought about showing you a thing or two, for example, how, and where, to configure load balancing or failover Multi Site StoreFront configurations and configure a disaster recovery Site which will then only be used when all other Sites are down. But, to be honest, it has already been described clearly on the Citrix E-Docs website, so I wonโt even bother, since Iโll probably wonโt be able to top it anyway. The main focus of this article is to raise some extra awareness towards some of the โhiddenโ but powerful features StoreFront has to offer. So without further ado, if you want to know more about configuring failover and load balanced multi Site configurations, user mapping, optimal NetScaler routing, Recovery Sites and StoreFront subscription synchronization, have a look here. The topics discussed are all listed at the bottom of the page. I hope this has been somewhat helpful. If you have any questions and or remarks, please let me know, itโs easy to miss a step or two along the way. Thanks!
Bas van Kaam ยฉ
Reference materials used: The Citrix E-Docs website.
Join [displaycount list=”Bas van Kaam”] other subscribers !
[optinform]
7 responses to “Configure StoreFront Multi-Site configurations”
Bas, did you read this part of the StoreFront 2.1 eDocs regarding the new keywords that can be used with multi-site configurations?
“You can override the specified deployment ordering for individual XenDesktop and XenApp resources to define preferred deployments to which users are connected when they access a particular desktop or application. This enables you to, for example, specify that users are preferentially connected to a deployment specifically adapted to deliver a particular desktop or application, but use other deployments for other resources.
To do this, append the string KEYWORDS:Primary to the description of the desktop or application on the preferred deployment and KEYWORDS:Secondary to the resource on other deployments. Where possible, users are connected to the deployment providing the primary resource, regardless of the deployment ordering specified in your configuration. Users are connected to deployments providing secondary resources when the preferred deployment is unavailable or when the user already has an active session on a non-preferred deployment.”
Source: http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/dws-storefront-21/dws-plan-ha.html
Hi Esther,
I did, great add-on, and definitely could come in handy. I guess I could have included it as well (I added in the E-Docs link) I presume thatโs what you where wondering about, why it wasn’t included I mean? Thanks for your input Esther!
Hi Bas,
If we allow the user to use internal LB on to 2 SF servers in the single location to reach out XA servers. Will these 2 SF servers sync automatically? Does the Internal LB sends out users on to these random SF servers or am I missing something?
Do you have any docs on the same, which shows these kind of configurations?
Hi Phani, I would suggest to give the Citrix E-Docs website a visit, youโll find some documentation there. Check out the link in the article as well.
It depends how you configure your SF servers, they can automatically redirect users to random Delivery Controllers (load balance) or directly map them to a certain deployment (Site) by implementing User Mapping for example.
Yes, StoreFront server part of the same deployment will synch their internal databases / user app subscriptions.
Regards,
Bas.
Thanks for the reply. Appreciated!!!
Quick question, Having StoreFront on 2012 a good idea? Did you come across any problems or issues with this setup?
Please suggest.
Cheers | Phani
Hi Phani, You’re welcome. Havenโt tried it yet, so please do and let me know how it worked out :-)
give ubuntu linux
Configure StoreFront Multi-Site configurations